DNR: A More Sensible, Respectful Agency?

In light of recent posts on this blog regarding spray irrigation of manure, it was interesting to read an article headlined DNR’s Moroney sees more sensible, respectful agency in Agri-View (posted Feb. 28, 2013) reporting on recent comments made by DNR Deputy Secretary Matt Moroney.

First, the article states, “The DNR’s philosophy is: Follow the law, utilize sound science and “insert commonsense” when need be, according to Moroney. The DNR is no longer a strong advocate one way or another on environmental issues,” Moroney said.

Later, the article shares the DNR’s position on the practice of Spray Manure Irrigation (what they now call precision manure irrigation, hoping to soften the image).

Moroney said the DNR is supportive of the concept of precision manure irrigation. The practice is already allowed under DNR rules, but there hasn’t been a lot of research. He thinks it’s a viable alternative to spreading manure in spring and fall, but he cautioned, there’s need to ensure human health is protected. Disease-transport research with the UW College of Agriculture and Live Sciences at the Marshfield Ag Research Station will look at how far manure vapor goes under different conditions. The department, said its deputy secretary, has the goal of finalizing technical standards on precision manure irrigation by June 1. Discussions with producers were held last year, and UW-Extension is facilitating continued talks.

If any regulations are necessary regarding precision manure irrigation, they’ll be science-based, he stressed.

Let’s hope the DNR considers all of the science-based information and input from the medical community in their decision making. One respected Wisconsin doctor says:  “Using center pivots to dispose of raw, untreated liquid manure is a reckless and dangerous practice. Here are the reasons why: (1) the cornerstone of good public health practice is to create a barrier between people and any raw, untreated manure, whether it be animal or human; (2) there are over 150 pathogens in raw, untreated animal manure, whether it be dairy, swine, or poultry manure; (3) at any given time in our population, 20% of the people are significantly susceptible to these pathogens – by significantly susceptible, I mean, they can become ill and die; (4) MRSA is an infection untreatable by antibiotics and extremely deadly – this is so, because the bacteria causing it are antibiotic resistant; (5) any person on chemotherapy is highly susceptible to become ill or die; (6) it is morally reprehensible to implement a practice that puts neighbors and others in harm’s way; and (7) there are hundreds of studies available for review by any interested or concerned citizen that document what I have stated above.”  — Margaret L Pulera, MD




Filed under General Information

2 responses to “DNR: A More Sensible, Respectful Agency?

  1. Thanks for all the pointers (7) from Dr. Pulera. You would think the DNR would respect us and protect our health – we the people.


  2. Nancy Utesch

    Insert “commonsense”? Whose commonsense? That’s the part that worries us…. It’s sad for this deputy secretary of the DNR to state that the “DNR is not a strong advocate one way or the other for the environment”. This entire article and commentary by Matt Moroney is a real turn-off, not only to citizens, but DNR personnel who did not sign on to work for the political interests, big business, and of course, the drastically gone wrong course of our current governor.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s